Bush: Latvia joins visa waiver program next month

Latvia and six other countries will join the U.S. Visa Waiver Program next month, President George Bush told an Oct. 17 meeting of foreign ambassadors at the White House.

The president said his administration is using its new authority to admit Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and South Korea to the program that allows citizens of those countries to enter the U.S. with just a passport.

“For years the leaders of these nations have explained to me how frustrating it is for their citizens to wait in lines and pay visa fees to take a vacation or make a business trip or visit their families here in the United States,” Bush said, according to his press office. “These close friends of America told me that it was unfair that their people had to jump through bureaucratic hoops that other allies can walk around.”

At present, a total of 27 countries, mostly in Western Europe, are part of the program, meaning their citizens can enter the United States with just a passport. U.S. citizens already are able to enter Latvia without a visa.

In Rīga, Foreign Minister Māris Riekstiņš expressed satisfaction with the announcement.

“This sort of decision has both political and symbolic meaning that without a doubt attests to the United States’ trust in Latvia,” Riekstiņš said, according to a foreign ministry press release.

Bush’s announcement confirmed rumors that had circulated for the past week that Latvia and other countries would soon be invited to join the Visa Waiver Program.

The U.S. State Department on Oct. 8 reported that the percentage of visa applications rejected by the American embassy in Rīga dropped to 8.3 percent during the past year. Under terms of the Visa Waiver Program, countries must have a refusal rate of no more than 10 percent.

Latvia also last month completed the waiver program’s consultative process when it signed an agreement with the United States on combatting serious crime. Latvia became the first to complete the process among a number of Eastern European nations working to join the Visa Waiver Program. The nations joining the Visa Waiver Program also had to institute several security measures, including the use of new tamper-proof biometric passports.

While the news is positive for Latvia, the process by which it and a number of other countries have been encouraged under the Bush Administration’s “visa waiver road map” has been critized by the U.S. General Accounting Office.

The GAO, the U.S. government’s own watchdog agency, issued a report Sept. 24 that questions why countries such as Latvia, whose visa refusal rate earlier had been above 10 percent, were fast-tracked for admission to the waiver program by the Department of Homeland Security while other nations with lower rates saw little progress. For 2007, Latvia’s refusal rate was 11.8 percent.

“The executive branch is moving aggressively to expand the Visa Waiver Program by the end of 2008, but, in doing so, DHS has not followed a transparent process,” according to the report.

As a result, information about the program could be confusing. For example, State Department officials told the GAO that it could be difficult to explain to countries such as Croatia, Israel and Taiwan—whose visa refusal rates already were lower than 10 percent last year—why the DHS was not negotiating with them about admission to the Visa Waiver Program but was talking to countries such as Latvia, where the refusal rate was higher.

Under DHS standard operating procedures, according to the GAO report, the process for admitting a country to the Visa Waiver Program begins with a nomination by the State Department. DHS then is to complete a comprehensive review of the candidate country and make a recommendation to Congress.

While the new members of the Visa Waiver Program were not nominated by the State Department, all of them had signed “road map” memoranda of understanding with the U.S. government—but that’s also not standard procedure, the GAO report added.

Andris Straumanis is a special correspondent for and a co-founder of Latvians Online. From 2000–2012 he was editor of the website.

Baltic Film Festival screens 20 works in Berlin

Classic films, new documentaries and other movies from Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania will be presented Oct. 17-22 during the Baltic Film Festival Berlin, according to organizers. The festival this year is part of the year-long Essentia Baltica 2008 culture festival taking place around Germany.

Films will be presented at the Babylon, Rosa-Luxemburg-Straße 30, Berlin. In all, 20 films will be screened.

Among Latvian films scheduled for screening are the late Juris Podnieks’ well-known 1986 documentary, Vai viegli būt jaunam? (Is It Easy To Be Young?), which examined youth culture in the time of Soviet perestroika, and Edvīns Šnore’s 2008 documentary, The Soviet Story, which looks at the historical relationship between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.

Other Latvian films on the program are Reibums (Disgust), a 2007 short feature by director Aiks Karapetjans; Natsid ja blondiinid (Nazis and Blondes), a 2008 Estonian-Latvian documentary directed by Arbo Tammiksaar; Teat Beat of Sex: Episodes 8, 9, 10, 11, a 2007 short animation film by Signe Baumane that was produced in New York; and Vai citi? (Us and Them), a 2006 documentary by Antra Cilinska.

Also on the program is a screening of Midsummer Madness, a 2006 feature film directed by the Latvia-born Alexander Hahn. The comedy, shot in Latvia, focuses on the efforts of a young man who visits the country during Midsummer to find his father’s former lover.

Latvia’s ambassador to Germany, Ilgvars Kļava, will be among officials speaking during the festival’s opening event Oct. 17, according to the Latvian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

For further information, visit www.balticfilmfestivalberlin.net.

Andris Straumanis is a special correspondent for and a co-founder of Latvians Online. From 2000–2012 he was editor of the website.

Georgia and Latvia, and Russia and America, too

Latvians are queasier about national security than in many years. Recently I took an intriguing photo of a large political advertisement sign just a few meters from our Rīga office. It portrays the American and Russian leaders side-by-side with George Bush pointing to some place vague and Vladimir Putin following along. The caption reads, “How much for Georgia?”

This question reveals cynical attitudes that many have, not only toward Putin, but Presiden Bush as well. It grieves me that so many Latvians have decreasing confidence in the integrity of the United States in international affairs.

Perhaps a little background would be helpful. In 2006, after years of ethnic turmoil and political unrest, two regions of Georgia, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, declared their intent to form new independent states. But below the surface, it has been clear that their leaders were puppets of Moscow, used to weaken Georgia and strengthen Russia.

On Aug. 6, in an effort to hinder the independence movement, Georgia foolishly lashed out at South Ossetia (slightly smaller than Switzerland). When Georgia attacked, Russia responded with overwhelming force. Almost 1,700 South Ossetian and Georgian civilians lost their lives and more than 158,000 were displaced.

On Aug. 7, Latvian Prime Minister Ivars Godmanis rushed to Tbilisi to show solidarity with the Georgian president and people. The presidents of Estonia, Lithuania and Poland joined him.

In Rīga, spontaneous anti-Russian protests occurred in front the Russian embassy. At the same time, numerous crowds gathered at the Georgian embassy (two blocks from the Russian embassy), burning candles and singing freedom songs. 

When I joined the crowd on Aug. 14, I was reminded of gatherings in which I participated in the late 1980s and early ‘90s in Latvia when she was struggling for freedom.

In a bold move, on Aug. 18, the Georgian parliament voted to withdraw from the Confederation of Independent States. The CIS had been comprised of 12 of the 15 former Soviet states. The Baltic States, having achieved independence in 1991, never joined the CIS.

On Aug. 26, Russia officially recognized the independence of both Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Two days later, the Georgian parliament passed a resolution declaring both territories as Russian-occupied.

Why are the Baltics so upset with what is happening in Georgia and South Ossetia? Simply put, they understand what a threat Moscow represents when its aggression is left unchecked. Russia has managed to harvest more and more of her vast natural resources. Her national treasury is lined with untold billions—and so are the pockets of countless political brokers. This makes Russia all the more dangerous.

Most in the West do not realize that Russia flexed her mighty muscles last year in Estonia. When Estonians removed an old Soviet monument from Tallinn’s Old City, Russian-driven riots broke out. The Estonian embassy in Moscow was attacked. Then a tremendously powerful computer viral attack was launched at the Estonian financial systems. Though not fully proven, many have attributed this attack to Russia. What did the NATO defense alliance do to protect their tiny member nation? Not so much—and Latvians took note.

Russia’s aggression toward Georgia was more significant than her hostility toward Estonia. She violated internationally agreed upon borders with the intent to annex more land and people.

Western protests were loud, NATO meetings were convened, and President Nicolas Sarkozy of France demonstrated some noteworthy diplomatic leadership. But so far, Russia has effectively taken away part of Georgia and no one has stopped her.

All signs indicate that Russia intends to retake area after area until her former empires are re-established and even surpassed. Western voices are joining together to prevent Russia from taking Moldova and the Ukraine next.

But are voices enough?

Sign of Bush and Putin

A sign in Rīga questions not only Russia’s designs on Georgia, but also America’s relationship with Russia. (Photo by Charles D. Kelley)

Charles D. Kelley is a Latvian-American with dual citizenship. He is the president of Bridge Builders International.