PBLA honors 3×3 movement’s founder Ruperte with annual award

Līga and Arnolds Ruperti

Līga Ruperte, seen here with her husband Arnolds, has been honored by the World Federation of Free Latvians.

Līga Ruperte, founder of the 3×3 culture camp movement that now is active on three continents, has been named this year’s recipient of the top honor awarded by the World Federation of Free Latvians (Pasaules brīvo latviešu biedrība, or PBLA).

The honor, which includes a cash award of USD 5,000 and a diploma, is announced on Nov. 18, the anniversary of Latvia’s declaration of independence. The honor recognizes Latvians for their noteworthy work in science, politics, the community or the arts. The honor was first bestowed in 1963, according to PBLA’s website.

The first camp was held in 1981 at the Latvian Center Gaŗezers in Michigan. Since then camps have been held also in the Catskill Mountains of New York, in Canada, France, Sweden and Australia, according a PBLA press release. In 1990, the first 3×3 camp was held in Latvia.

Ruperte, who was born in Daugavpils in 1932 and moved to the United States after World War II, developed the culture camp movement in 1980. Leaving maintenance of Latvian identity in exile to the existing system of ethnic education was insufficient, Ruperte suggested. Adults especially needed to be motivated, according to the PBLA press release.

Ruperte’s idea for the 3×3 camp called for a week-long experience in which Latvians of all ages would participate. Although structured, the camps are informal and include a variety of activities and topics, covering areas as politics, foodways, ceramics, music and dance.

Since the first one, a total of 180 3×3 camps have been held around the world, serving 26,000 ethnic Latvians, according to the PBLA. Ruperte herself has led a number of the camps or served as a lecturer. She remains a board member of the camp movement in the United States, Australia and Latvia.

Ruperte earned her doctorate in education in 1973 from the University of Michigan. She has worked as a teacher and school director. Besides her work with 3×3, she also has participated in Latvian summer high schools in the U.S. and Australia, as well as an instructor in the 2×2 camp movement, which is geared toward training young leaders for Latvian communities.

Ruperte also served on the board of the Americn Latvian Association, from 1977-1993 leading the organization’s efforts in extracurricular education. From 1979-2003, she led the PBLA’s education board. In 1995 she founded and until 2003 led the Family Support Coordination Center (Ģimenes atbalsta koordinācijas center) in Latvia.

Ruperte is married to Arnolds Ruperts. They have a son, also named Arnolds, and three grandchildren, Anita, Arnolds and Andrejs.

Putin’s war of words: The irony of Russia’s propaganda against Latvia

Latvia’s greatest international concern currently is its position and perception in the global arena. Russia, full well realizing this, has launched a malicious propaganda campaign against the current Latvian government headed by Vienotība (Unity) and Prime Minister Valdis Dombrovskis.

Moscow’s campaign to try to oust Latvian Foreign Minister Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis from office is one of the most overt and recent examples of this. Another recent example is the introduction by the Russian delegation to the United Nations of a resolution condemning the so-called glorification of Nazism and the dismantling of World War II monuments (read: monuments glorifying Joseph Stalin and the 50-year Soviet occupation of the Baltic republics). 

Russia’s and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s disinformation campaign (with the help of the Russian parties in Latvia—Harmony Centre and For Human Rights in a United Latvia—and their Latvian allies, the oligarchs Ainārs Šlesers, Andris Šķēle and Aivars Lembergs) is intended to quash Latvia’s independence and progress, not to mention to further dilute and damage the Latvian language and Latvia’s unique cultural identity. 

Throughout their propaganda, the Russians are using inflammatory catchwords like Nazi, Hitler, fascist and russophobe. These words are infamous, “politically incorrect” and catch the attention of most everyone. It is a cheap trick, and hopefully intelligent and well-informed people will not buy into it. Hopefully the European Union, UN, the NATO defense alliance and the United States “get it,” as they say, because the Kremlin-controlled Russian media are a dangerous cocktail of propaganda, chauvinism and xenophobia.

Let’s step back and put things into perspective. Stalin’s Russian bolsheviks, communists and terrorists (the NKVD and, later, the KGB) were just as bad, if not worse, than Adolph Hitler and his Nazis. Stalin himself was a narcissistic and paranoid egoist, who ultimately killed many more people than Hitler, and, interestingly enough, Putin is currently trying to resurrect and improve Stalin’s reputation in Russia. Putin’s government sponsored Russian history textbooks that glorify Stalin. Many journalists have written of Putin’s admiration of Stalin and compared the two. Some of those journalists were assassinated. The Russian law enacted by Putin whereby anyone equating Hitler with Stalin can be prosecuted is of great significance to the topic at hand.

In contrast to the current propaganda coming out of the Kremlin, it is also important to consider catchwords such as Stalin, KGB, Siberia, deportation, gulag, famine and Great Purge. Stalin’s Russian terrorists ultimately occupied Latvia for 50 years! They sent thousands upon thousands of Latvians to their deaths in Siberian concentration camps. They virtually outlawed the Latvian language and religion. The NKVD and KGB forced Latvians to spy on each other. They flooded Latvia with ethnic Russians in an attempt to dilute and ultimately dissolve Latvia. During Stalin’s reign and the Soviet era, Latvia of the three Baltic republics was deliberately the most saturated with ethnic Russians. Latvia is still struggling with the consequences today.

Now the Russians accuse us of being anti-Russian. Of course, it is only natural that we are now wary of Russia’s motives in Latvia, and wish to protect our language, cultural identity and independence. Unfortunately, Russia will not admit to the basic historical fact of its 50-year occupation of Latvia, and that of many other countries. Stalin’s terrors unleashed on Latvia were also experienced by many other countries and ethnic groups including the Estonians, Lithuanians, Ukrainians, Poles, Romanians, Volga Germans, Crimean Tatars, Kalmyks, Chechens, Ingush, Balkars, Karachays, Meshketian Turks, Bulgarians, Greeks, Koreans, kulaks and people of Jewish descent. The Ukrainian Holodomor famine and genocide (at least 3 million and possibly up to 10 million people starved to death) and the execution of Polish prisoners of war known as the Katyn Massacre (22,000 Polish officers and intellectuals were killed) are of particular note because of the staggering number of people who died and perished as a result of Stalin’s mandates during these cataclysmic and inhumane horrors. Stalin was a mass murderer and a butcher, and Putin is his admirer.

As modern day public relations campaigns go, the Russians have done well on a very base level, but they did not succeed in ousting Latvian Foreign Minister Kristovskis. Let’s hope Europe and the rest of the world realize what Russia is really up to. Why should Putin express concerns about the civil and human rights of ethnic Russians in Latvia, when he ignores the rights of most Russians, and causes many to suffer, in his own Russia? It is hypocrisy at its worst.

What about the human rights of the 52 journalists murdered in Russia since 1992? Remember the November 2006 deadly poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko in a London restaurant?Litvinenko was a former colonel in the Russian secret service and a fierce critic of Putin. Did Russia consider the civil and human rights of former world chess champion Garry Kasparov and his “Other Russia” supporters when they participated in an authorized anti-Putin rally in Moscow in November 2007, a week before parliamentary elections? No, Kasparov was arrested and imprisoned for five days. Other demonstrators at the Moscow rally were also arrested. In St. Petersburg, at a demonstration also organized by Kasparov, 200 people were arrested as they chanted “Russia without Putin.” For these and many other transgressions by Putin’s regime against the Russian people, it is disingenuous and hypocritical of Moscow to now accuse Latvia of violating the human rights of ethnic Russians in Latvia. The overall quality of life of ethnic Russians living in Latvia is better than that of most Russians living in Russia.

It is currently popular and important throughout the world to be politically correct. Putin’s propaganda against Latvia guises itself in a cloak of civil rights and political correctness in an attempt to manipulate the international community against Latvia. He plays the political correctness card masterfully (but hypocritically). Personally, I would like to believe that the leaders in Europe, the U.S. and other countries are wise enough to see through Moscow’s cloak of propaganda and hypocrisy. 

The irony of the Kremlin’s deliberately provocative use of the words fascist and Nazi to slander patriotic Latvians is that the largest country in the world today where the government engages in fascism is Putin’s own Russia.

(Update 19 NOV 2010: The first paragraph has been modified for clarity.)

PBLA paziņo rezultātus konkursā ‘Mans pētījums par Latviju un latviešiem’

2010. gada janvārī Pasaules brīvo latviešu apvienības (PBLA) Izglītības padome izsludināja konkursu “Mans pētījums par Latviju un latviešiem” skolēniem ārpus Latvijas no 6-18 gadu vecuma. Konkurss tagad beidzies un uzvarētāji katrā vecuma grupā zināmi, ziņo Dace Copeland, Izglītības padomes priekšsēde un konkursa vadītāja.

Konkurss noritēja divos klašu grupējumos: jaunākām klasēm no sagatavošanas klases līdz 8. klasei (6 – 14 g.v.) un vidusskolas klasēm (15 – 18 g.v.).  Jaunāko klašu grupa tika sadalīta trīs apakšdaļās un temati par kuŗiem izstrādāt darbu attiecīgi piemēroti katrai vecuma apakšdaļai. Apbalvojumu guva katras vecuma grupas labākā darba autors. Jaunāko skolēnu grupā piedalījās 54 dalībnieki no četriem kontinentiem un 11 dažādām skolām: Adelaides latviešu skolas (Austrālija), Anglijas, Bostonas latviešu skolas (ASV), Briseles Eiropas skolas, Indianāpoles latviešu skolas (ASV), Kalamazū latviešu skolas (ASV), Kanādas, Melburnas latviešu pamatskolas (Austrālija), Milvoku latviešu skolas (ASV), Mineāpoles latviešu skolas (ASV) un Ņudžersijas latviešu skolas (ASV). Vecāko skolēnu grupā neviens nepiedalījās.

Jaunākie dalībnieki varēja izvēlēties atbildēt uz dažādiem jautājumiem savā vecuma grupā: Kas ir Dziesmu svētki vai Dziedāšanas svētki vai Kultūras dienas; Kādi senie latviešu raksti man patīk un ko tie simbolizē, Kādi latviešu svētki man patīk; Gadalaiki Latvijā; Kādi ziedi/koki/zivis/dzīvnieki atrodami Latvijā; Kādi ir Latvijas simboli un ko tie katrs nozīmē; Par ko es varu būt lepns, jo esmu latvietis; Kādi sporti Latvijā populāri; Kādi ēdieni Latvijā iecienīti; Kas ir Baltijas ceļš; Apraksts par vienu senlatviešu pili; Apraksts un salīdzinājums par visiem Atmodas laikiem, kas saistīti ar Latviju.

6 g.v. grupā piedalījās divi skolēni. Uzvarētāja bija Laura Legzdiņa no Kanādas ar darbu “Dziesmu svētki Amerikā un Kanādā”.

7 g.v. grupā dalībnieku nebija.

8 g.v. grupā piedalījās viena skolniece, Nadīna Sedē, no Briseles Eiropas skolas un rakstīja par futbolu.

9 g.v. grupā piedalījās 11 skolēni. Uzvarētājs bija Kyle Byron no Ņudžersijas latviešu skolas ASV ar savu darbu par lakstīgalu.

10 g.v. grupā piedalījās 6 skolēni. Uzvarētāja bija Marlēna Ramane no Mineāpoles latviešu skolas ASV ar savu darbu par Baltijas ceļu.

11 g.v. grupā piedalījās 15 skolēni. Uzvarētājs bija Zigurds Beķeris no Mineāpoles latviešu skolas ASV ar savu darbu par Latvijas zivīm.

12 g.v. grupā piedalījās 6 skolēni. Uzvarētāja bija Laura Viksniņa no Mineāpoles latviešu skolas ASV ar savu darbu par Dziesmu svētkiem.

13 g.v. grupā piedalījās 7 skolēni. Uzvarētājs bija Āris Putenis no Ņudžersijas latviešu skolas ASV ar savu darbu par senlatviešu pili.

14 g.v. grupā piedalījās 6 skolēni. Uzvarētāja bija Ilze Vizule no Kalamazū latviešu skolas ASV ar savu darbu par Baltijas ceļu.

Katrs konkursa savas vecuma grupas uzvarētājs varēs izvēlēties latviešu grāmatas, mūziku vai filmas USD 100 vērtībā.

Konkursa darbi bija veikti dažādos formatos. Visiem darbiem bija jāpienāk konkursa vadītājai pa e-pastu. Bija rakstu darbi domrakstu veidā ar bildēm, bija prezentācijas veida darbi, lietojot “Microsoft PowerPoint” programmu, bija plakāti un bija filma! Izvēlētie temati, bez minētiem, bija dažādi: par maziem ērgļiem, brūnais lācis, es lepojos ar savu omiņu, biatlons, lielā zīlīte, latviešu ēdieni, eirāzijas lūsis, Latvijas hokeja zelta mirkļi, sports Latvijā: basketbols, hokejs, futenis, ziemas olimpiskās spēles, mūsu mīļā Latvija, kāpēc esmu lepns latvietis uc.

Darbus vērtēja četras ilggadīgas izglītības darbinieces, kas darbojas ārzemju latviešu izglītības laukā: Anita Bataraga (ASV), Daina Grosa (Latvija), Ingrīda Veidnere (Austrālija) un Lauma Vlasova (Krievija). Darbus vērtējumā bieži atšķīra punkta desmitā daļa vai pat simdaļa, tādēļ vērtēšanas komisijai bija grūts darbs.

Copeland pateicās visiem skolēniem, kas piedalījās PBLA rīkotā konkursā, un visiem skolotājiem, skolu pārziņiem un vecākiem, kas to piedalīšanos veicināja.