How Latvia celebrates its independence

How is Nov. 18 marked in the homeland? What does Latvia’s Independence Day mean to Latvians living in Latvia, 15 years after the renewal of independence? Is patriotism growing among the population? Is it being taught in some way to the younger generation—Latvia’s future “movers and shakers”?

I was keen to get answers to these questions as I celebrated Latvia’s Independence Day in Latvia, not on the other side of the world, as I usually do. Our family has temporarily moved to Latvia from Australia, to experience all the sights and sounds and smells and textures of Latvia for a full year.

One of the highlights of our trip has been to celebrate Nov. 18 in Rīga. In Australia, the Latvian community still considers this a sacred day. It is not really a day for celebration as such, but more reflection and reverence for the past and a sobering look at present-day Latvia, its achievements as well as its shortcomings. I will always associate Nov. 18 with the national anthem and long, official speeches. For me the word svinīgs (ceremonial) always comes to mind. Would the same feeling be evoked on this day while in Rīga?

On the 17th, the children’s school had its Nov. 18 commemoration. My kids had not had to learn to recite any patriotic poems this year, which already was a change from what I was used to back in Australia. Neither did they have to sing or dance, nor did they have to wear national costumes. So how were they going to take part? I soon found out. I was one of a handful of parents who attended this event in the school hall. Grades 1 and 2 were seated and treated to a concert by six Grade 5 and 6 Student Council members who recited a few patriotic songs and poems with instrumental music playing in the background. This was interspersed with a few Latvian folk dances by the school’s folk dance ensemble. The concert started with the national anthem, “Dievs, svētī Latviju!,” and ended with the song “Nevis slinkojot un pustot” by Andrejs Jurjāns,—25 minutes’ worth of patriotism. The kids were then led back to their classrooms where they celebrated with a kliņģeris (a traditional Latvian birthday cake) with red and white candles. Grades 3 and 4 were scheduled to attend the concert a half hour later. The meaning of Nov. 18 was later discussed in the classroom but our Grade 1 son “couldn’t remember” what they talked about.

Our 3-year-old son’s kindergarten in Rīga celebrated on Nov. 21. Relatives were invited to come and celebrate with the children. We sang a few songs, played a few games (rotaļas) and gathered around the table for honey on rye bread with milk. The table was decorated with a centerpiece of tea light candles in the shape of Latvia.

Every educational establishment has worked out its own tradition. This is a commendable thing, but do the kids “catch” the spirit of pride in their nation and of being Latvian? I hope they learn to get a warm and fuzzy feeling and a tear in their eye when they hear the national anthem or hear someone recite a patriotic poem. These minor details—all part of traditions that stem back to childhood—all play a big part in forming our weltanschauung later on in life.

Nov. 18 dawned with no signs of rain or snow. The streets were not only decorated with the compulsory Latvian flags but also with official banners of various kinds. Even the haberdashery shop across the road had put red-and-white sweaters and shawls in the window display! I switched on the TV and the kids’ programme had a feature on Nov. 18 with a well-known history teacher explaining the meaning of the words to the national anthem to the children.

Thousands marched in the traditional parade led by academic sororities from the city center to the Brāļu kapi, a good hour’s walk away. My husband took part and felt quite moved by the whole experience. The military parade was watched by thousands. A vast majority of spectators were families with young children. This is apparently becoming a family tradition, as is the laying of flowers by the Freedom Monument on this day. Huge screens were set up either side of the Freedom Monument and all afternoon patriotic songs could be heard over loudspeakers as far as the sound would carry.

After the parade Rīga was full of people. Many had come from outside the center, so couldn’t go home and had to pass the time till the official address by the president in the evening, followed by fireworks over the River Daugava. Restaurants and pubs were full and the Old Town was bursting at the seams. Many people apparently had heard the invitation by the media for families to treat this as a special day, to get together and have a meal in honor of the day. The public address by President Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga was heard in person by thousands. The atmosphere was one of pomp and ceremony. Various concerts throughout the evening seconded this feeling, as would the official state function presided over by the president and all the other state representatives. And fireworks, of course, always add that certain “wow” factor to an occasion.

Unfortunately for me, the president’s address was disrupted by a few Russian-speaking men, speaking loudly on their cell phones through most of the speech. This dampened my spirits for a while. But the overall impression was that people want this to be a special day so they are prepared to support the whole idea and come to the center to take part. But is it up to the “powers that be” to provide the “entertainment”? Maybe things could be done on a much smaller scale and be just as meaningful.

The most memorable part of this weekend was a concert, “Reiz bija…” at the VEF Kultūras pils. Meant for children of all ages, the concert in my opinion meant more than any fireworks or grand concert. It was a modern-day fairy tale that taught children the values and world view that can be found in Latvian folk tales and songs. It not only provided a gateway for the younger crowd to enter a magical world conjured up by their ancestors, but gave a subliminal environmental impact message. Only by gaining knowledge about our own heritage can we stand proud with our belief in the future of our nation in the 21st century.

Daina Gross is editor of Latvians Online. An Australian-Latvian she is also a migration researcher at the University of Latvia, PhD from the University of Sussex, formerly a member of the board of the World Federation of Free Latvians, author and translator/ editor/ proofreader from Latvian into English of an eclectic mix of publications of different genres.

Bush to propose easing of visa requirements

U.S. President George Bush will send a proposal to Congress to ease visa requirements for Latvian citizens wanting to visit America.

Bush, visiting Rīga during the NATO defense alliance summit, announced his plan Nov. 28 after visiting with Latvian President Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga.

“She is deeply concerned that the people of Latvia aren’t able to travel to the United States as freely as she would like,” Bush said in a joint appearance with Vīķe-Freiberga after their discussions.

Latvian officials have been pushing for almost two years to have the United States ease visa restrictions. Since 1996, U.S. citizens have been able to enter Latvia with just a passport, but Latvian citizens wishing to visit the United States still need to apply for a visa and pay a USD 100 fee.

In Washington, D.C., Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said in statement that easing visa restrictions would come with increase security requirements.

“We envision a secure travel authorization system that will allow us to receive data about travelers from countries before they get on the plane,” Chertoff said. “Countries that are willing to assist the United States in doing effective checks on travelers could be put on track to enter the program soon. For countries seeking admission to the Visa Waiver Program, this would be an opportunity to set a standard that will be applied to the program generally.”

Latvian Foreign Minister Artis Pabriks welcomed Bush’s readiness to address the visa issue, the Foreign Ministry said in a press release. At the same time, it reminded Latvian citizens traveling to the United States to observe U.S. visa regulations.

The closest Latvia and other new European Union members have come to gaining visa waivers for their citizens is in legislation passed in May by the U.S. Senate. The Senate’s version of the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 included an amendment that would grant visa waiver for EU countries that provide material support for U.S. military action in Afghanistan and Iraq. Although Latvia has troops stationed in both countries, the number falls short of what qualified as “material support” in the Senate’s bill: the equivalent of a battalion, or from 300 to 1,000 military personnel.

Although the bill had bipartisan support in the Senate as well as the backing of Bush, it is stalled in the House of Representatives.

Nearly 12,000 nonimmigrants from Latvia, including about 5,400 tourists, were admitted to the United States during 2005, according to the Yearbook of Immigration Statistics.

Andris Straumanis is a special correspondent for and a co-founder of Latvians Online. From 2000–2012 he was editor of the website.

Documents claim U.S., U.K. supported occupation

Declassified intelligence documents reveal the Soviet entry into the Baltic states during 1940 was viewed with understanding by the United States and the United Kingdom, Russia’s Interfax news service reported Nov. 23.

The documents, held by the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, show the two Western powers saw the Soviet occupation “as an unpleasant but necessary measure to oppose Nazi Germany’s aggression,” Interfax reported.

The information—revealed just days before the NATO defense alliance summit in Rīga—was requested by the Duma, Russia’s parliament, the news service said.

No immediate reaction was available from the U.K. Foreign and Commonwealth Office or the U.S. State Department. But the Latvian Ministry of Foreign Affairs blasted the report. The story is yet another clumsy attempt by Russia to rewrite Latvian history and to justify the Soviet occupation in 1940, Atis Lots, the ministry’s press secretary, told Latvians Online in an e-mail.

“It is not necessary to dig in Russian archives to learn that the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was signed in 1939,” Lots said, “(and) that the Stalinist Soviet Union cooperated with Hitler’s Germany (by providing material for war, training officers, etc.) up to start of World War II.”

The Interfax report makes no mention of the 1939 nonaggression treaty signed by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, nor of the secret Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact that placed the Baltic republics in the Soviet sphere of influence.

According to Interfax, the U.S. and British perspective on the entry of Soviet forces into the Baltics was obtained by Soviet spies based in the Western powers.

“Unique information resources that our intelligence services possessed in London and Washington made it possible to have a clear picture of the evolution in the U.S. and British political leaderships’ approaches toward understanding the importance of the Baltic region for opposing the German aggression, i.e. not only for the USSR but also for the entire anti-Hitler coalition that was formed in the second half of 1941,” Interfax reported, citing the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service press bureau.

The report claims the documents show the Western powers saw the takeover of the Baltics as an “unpleasant but necessary and timely step” to remove pro-German governments. In Latvia’s case, that meant the removal of the authoritarian regime of Kārlis Ulmanis, who had staged a bloodless coup in 1934.

Lots dismissed the report, saying Latvia has no doubt about the role of the United States and the United Kingdom in the country’s history.

“These countries supported Latvia’s formation in 1918 and its international recognition, as well as cooperated with the Republic of Latvia before the war,” he said. “They have never recognized the illegal incorportion of Latvia into the USSR. The United States and Great Britain also have offered invaluable support in the renewal of independence, in the removal of Russian troops, and in Latvia’s development, including in the process of joining the European Union and NATO.”

Interfax’s news story also notes the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service has a document pertaining to treatment of Jews under the German occupation. “The memoirs of a female prisoner of the Jewish ghetto in Rīga described the practices used there, which turn out to have been even more inhuman than those in the Warsaw ghetto, which is better known to the public,” Interfax reported.

Soviet forces were forced out of the Baltics by German forces in 1941, but regained control of the countries in 1944. Only in 1991 were Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania able to regain their independence.

Andris Straumanis is a special correspondent for and a co-founder of Latvians Online. From 2000–2012 he was editor of the website.