Commentary
Recent commentary
TV service tells story of Latvians in Ireland
Media ethics slip, politicians stumble
Apple re-emerges in the Baltics
Atskaite par vizītes trīs galveniem uzdevumiem
Platforma’s plans for free music raise questions
Tempo of change quickens in Latvian politics
Only a new cork in the old bottle?
Valsts prezidenta apsveikums tautiešiem ārzemēs
‘Light’ version of anthem should be outlawed
For more information
Valsts simbolika
From the Saiema’s official Web site, visitors can read the text and notes of the national anthem, as well as download a recording of the song. LV
November 21, 2005
As national anthems go, the Latvian hymn “Dievs, svētī Latviju!” is a rather short one. So why bother even having a short version?
Because some politicians apparently think it’s necessary. The conservative Latvian party Tēvzemei un brīvībai / LNNK (For Fatherland and Freedom / LNNK) wants to define what counts as the short version of the national anthem.
The party on Nov. 16 introduced an amendment to Latvia’s law on the national anthem that fixes the short version of the song as one that does not repeat the first stanza. In other words, the short version would call for singing “Dievs, svētī Latviju, Mūs’ dārgo tēviju, Svētī jel Latviju, Ak, svētī jel to!” just once, then, as usual, twice singing “Kur latvju meitas zied, Kur latvju dēli dzied, Laid mums tur laimē diet, Mūs’ Latvijā!”
That would shave a whopping 30 seconds from the song composed by Kārlis Baumanis and first performed in 1873. The version of the song available on the Saeima’s Web site clocks in at 2 minutes and 15 seconds. Snipping the repeated first stanza reduces it to 1 minute and 45 seconds.
The Saeima, Latvia’s parliament, may take up the amendment later this week.
According to the bill, the amendment is necessary because a Cabinet of Ministers decree approved earlier this year allows for performance of a short version, but doesn’t say what the short version should be. Given the growing number of occasions when the national anthem must be played, according to the bill, “this allows unfettered interpretations, which during various events (especially sports) and official ceremonies increasingly debase not only the point and essence of our nation’s symbol, but also degrade the overall artistic quality of the hymn.”
During some sporting events “Dievs, svētī Latviju” is cut to no more than 55 seconds, according to the Cabinet of Ministers.
The cabinet in 1999 first adopted rules for the publication of notes and recordings of the anthem. Based on recommendations from the National Anthem Commission, those rules were replaced this June with clearer standards. Unfortunately, the only standards for the short version are that it use the same arrangement as that for symphonic and brass orchestras and that it be in B flat major.
The tēvzemieši are right to be concerned about different interpretations. But rather than etching in stone what the short version of the anthem should be, why not just disallow a short version? It won’t kill anyone to stand at attention for 30 seconds longer. Some things in life deserve more than the radio edit.
If we are to have an official “light” version of the national anthem (now with 22 percent less lyrics and music!), why not take on waste in other Latvian national symbols, too? Let’s make the maroon proportion of the flag smaller, because so many folks anyway forget there’s a 2:1:2 ratio to the colors in the sarkanbaltsarkans, not to mention that it’s supposed to be twice as long as it is wide. And, even though there are three approved versions of the coat of arms, why have three stars in it? Won’t one do?
No, it’s a bad idea. National symbols should set a standard. To even acknowledge that a short version of the national anthem is acceptable is the wrong course of action. The tēvzemieši should instead insist that the only acceptable version of Latvia’s national anthem is the long one.
Andris Straumanis is editor of Latvians Online.
What's new
Blogs
06 Jul 2008
Re ko uzgāju garā gājienā
Dziesmu svētku gājiens bieži paliek atmiņā skaidrāk nekā paši Dziesmu svētki, jo tajā tiešām var redzēt to Latvijas…
Blogs
05 Jul 2008
Svētki ir sākušies!
Lielie dziedāšanas un dejošanas svētki ir sākušies! Kā mēs visi tos gaidījām, gan dalībnieki, gan līdzjutēji. Un kāds…
News
05 Jul 2008
Referendum on boosting pensions set Aug. 23
Just three weeks after voters get to decide if they should have the constitutional right to call for…
In the forums
Jānis Jurkāns discovers "Muttsie" posted by Juris Kazha on 06 Jul 2008
What was meant to be said... posted by Mikus E_ on 06 Jul 2008
Served in US Army Signal Corp in Karlsrugh 1960 thru 1962 posted by jay monarch on 05 Jul 2008
Song and Dance Celebration posted by Arija on 05 Jul 2008
For my fellow American Latvians and Latvian-Americans posted by Roberts on 04 Jul 2008
Advertise with Latvians Online! Click here
Comments about this article
Gail Ozolins
Considering how long you Latvians (I am not Latvian) were unable to sing your national anthem, I am surprized that someone would want to shorten it!
24 Nov 2005 (Canada)
Gundars Strautnieks
The national anthem should remain in its origional version as composed by Karlis Baumanis. Politicians have no right to dishonor our beloved ''Dievs Sveti Latviju''.
27 Nov 2005 (United States)
Edgars Valdmanis
The latvian national anthem must remain as composed by Karlis Baumanis and not altered in any way. Please do not dishonor our belowed " Dievs Sveti Latviju".
27 Nov 2005 (United States)
Herberts Everss
There is already enough disrespect in singing of the USA national anthem, with different lyrics and melodies, with "whooping and hollering" at sports functions, before the end. As Latvians, who are proud of our heritage and who sang our hearts out each time the hymn was sung, when we were still under the "Iron Curtain", we must continue the honor and dignity that was so intended and continue to sing "Dievs Sveti Latviju" in its full version and length.
27 Nov 2005 (United States)
Erika Vitolins
Latvia's hymn Dievs, sveti Latviju! Is a prayer and never in any way should be altered.Alteration speaks of disrespect. Whoever thought of alteration,is not a real Latvian
27 Nov 2005 (United States)
Rudolfs Kalnmals
I can not understand why the latvian national anthem should be changed in to a shorter version. If Karlis Baumanis (composer of music and text ) wanted to use the prayer "Dievs, sveti Latviju" twice, it should stay that way! Politicions have no right to change it!
27 Nov 2005 (United States)
Aija Kengis
Dievs sveti Latviju is part of our history and as an anthem nobody has the right to change its original version.
27 Nov 2005 (United States)
Ugis Grinbergs
Why do politicians always believe they have some kind of right to alter what is history and basis for a country? "Dievs, Sveti Latviju" should not be modified. Where will it stop? Ugis Grinbergs
28 Nov 2005 (United States)
Rasma Ellis
Shortning the national anthem is not appropriate. The anthem is the anthem and does not require a shortened version. Let is stand as is. It deserves respect and respect for the entire anthem, not a less lengthy version of it.
29 Nov 2005 (United States)
Gaida Jansons-Veidemanis
Dear politicians: Why not think big? Start first by changing the worlds "big guys" first. My suggestion is, start with Mozart, Verdi, Tchaikovsky, Schubert and Handel. This will not only gain you experience , which you definately need, but above all, you will then be ridiculed by the whole world, not just the Latvian people. so again. THINK BIG .
30 Nov 2005 (United States)
Gunars Graudins
Ours is a prayer for blessing and protection of Latvia and Latvians. Some of us get choked up trying to sing it, but usually we regain our composure. It is followed by absolute silence, like other prayers, not by howling, whistling and applause, as is an American custom. They also hire someone to sing it for them, sometimes competing for "top 10". Most of them cannot sing it. It does require rather wide tonal range I believe this prayer should be voiced only on serious occasions celebrating our freedom and its defense. Not for ball games (US) of movies (GB). I am glad I have not seen our colors as a patch on jeans.
07 Dec 2005 (United States)
Imants Gudze
I was born in a refugee camp in Europe to parents who had to flee the scourge of the nazis and communists during WW2. The most sacred thing to me is the national anthem that i learned in its present form. Do not let the bastards tamper with it .
08 Dec 2005 (Australia)
Janis Urpens
Dievs, sveti Latviju! Our National Anthem is sacred to all Latvians. Politicians should not interfere with our anthem, it is fundamentally wrong. If Baumanis meant it to be that long it should remain that long.
08 Dec 2005 (Great Britain (UK))
Andrew Stengrevics
A national anthem is a sacred symbol of sovreignty. It should remain as the composer intended and forever performed in the manner when it was designated to be a musical representation. While playing in a US military band in the 1970's it was suggested that the Star Spangled Banner have an abrupt key change half way through to accomodate the vocal range. We recorded the version as requested. It was terrible. We sent it back to whomever in Congress passed it on to us. Obviously there was some discussion regarding the 'adaptation'. The 'right' people saw the lack of value in making a change. Hopefully level heads in the Saeima will prevail over this issue. Yes we Americans don't treat the Star Spangled as properly and respectfully as we should. Look what happened to the Lord's Prayer as some versions made it gender neutral. Change is a fact of life. But some things are better left alone.
09 Dec 2005 (United States)
Ventis Plume
What does this party represent? It is obvous that they have nothing important to legislate than to shorten the national anthem.
10 Dec 2005 (United States)
Edite Lynch
Dievs, (ludzu) Sveti Latviju! is definitely our nation's prayer for blessings and protection always. It was sung for over 50 years in far flung reaches of the world, wherever Latvians had fled to to find freedom. Many of us, myself included, from an early age could not sing this hymn without crying for the Latvian souls who were suffering tremendous pain and anguish. It was not until I was well into my fifties that I was able to control the welling of tears in my eyes. I owe the love of my fatherland to my parents who taught me well Latvia's poignant and painful history. I seemed to experience it all quite vicariously. Do not, under any circumstances, tolerate any changes to this hymn. The repetition of the two verses only seeks to further imprint the words in our hearts.
13 Dec 2005 (United States)
Peters
The generations of Latvians that fled into exile, many never to see their homeland again, sang those repeating stanzas with tears of joy--and wiht sadness over their loss--and with hope for the future. Any party that has nothing better to do take a scalpel to an anthem that kept hope alive both in exile and at home defiles those hopes and insults those that never lived to see Latvia free again. Perhaps we need to repeat the first stanza three times--in some quarters, twice is obviously not enough to sink in to have any effect.
24 Dec 2005 (United States)
Ivar Lavins
Maybe I am the only one that thinks so, but I aprove of a short version of "Dievs Sveti Latviju." for certain ocasions. I love our himn and almost cry, everytime we sing it. But, like someone said it is a prayer. It should be sung only at the right time and right place, like patriotic holidays and "Dziesmu Svetki", like patriotic organization aniveseries. In sports competitions were latvians win over some other nationalities, it would be apropriate but not at every game. Amerikans do that and it is silly. If our government insist then there could be a short version or a recording.
20 Jan 2006 (United States)