One cannot read this without goosebumps (and not the good kind) running up the arms! I cannot begrudge his point of the hypocrisy of some of the other G8 states and democracy/civil rights, but that falls flat when looking at the cr*p the Putinocracy is involved with both within and without their own borders! Is Edward Lucas (thanks PC) the only one calling him on this?

Just the title is enough to make me choke on my coffee!
Putins uzskata sevi par “pasaulē vienīgo absolūto un tīro demokrātu”
Putin sees himself as “the only absolute and clean democrat in the world”

Šis raksts izdrukāts no TVNET portāla
http://www.tvnet.lv/zinas/printArticle.php?id=501883

Putins uzskata sevi par “pasaulē vienīgo absolūto un tīro demokrātu”

LETA/RIA NOVOSTI

04. jūnijs (2007)

Krievijas prezidents Vladimirs Putins paziņojis, ka uzskata sevi par “absolūtu demokrātu” un ir pārliecināts, ka Krievijā nav nekādu priekšnosacījumu, lai tā atgrieztos totalitārajā režīmā.

Intervijā “lielā astotnieka” valstu plašsaziņas līdzekļiem, atbildot uz vācu žurnāla “Der Spiegel” korespondenta jautājumu, vai Krievijā nav vērojama tendence atgriezties totalitārajā režīmā, Putins teica: “Tie ir pilnīgi meli, neticiet nevienam.” Pēc tam Krievijas prezidents paziņoja vācu žurnālistam, ka uzskata sevi par “absolūtu un tīru demokrātu”. “Taču zināt, kur tā nelaime? Pat ne nelaime, bet īsta traģēdija,” Putins turpināja atbildēt uz “Der Spiegel” jautājumu. “Tajā apstāklī, ka es tāds esmu viens, citu tādu pasaulē vienkārši nav.”
Putins ierosināja Rietumu plašsaziņas līdzekļiem pievērst uzmanību situācijai demokrātijas jomā ārpus Krievijas robežām. Pēc viņa teiktā, ASV ir “vienas šausmas: spīdzināšana, bezpajumtnieki, Gvantanamo, turēšana apcietinājumā bez tiesas un izmeklēšanas”. Eiropā situācija neesot labāka: “Pret demonstrantiem izturas cietsirdīgi, gumijas lodes un asaru gāze tiek izmantotas te vienā, te otrā galvaspilsētā, uz ielām nogalina demonstrantus.”

“Par pēcpadomju telpu es vispār nerunāju,” turpināja Putins. “Bija viena cerība uz puišiem no Ukrainas, taču viņi pilnībā sevi diskreditēja un tur tuvojas pilnīga tirānija. Pilnībā tiek pārkāpta konstitūcija, visi likumi un tā tālāk.” “Pēc Mahatmas Gandija nāves vairs nav ar ko parunāt,” teica Krievijas prezidents.

Sākot runāt nopietnākā tonī, Krievijas prezidents teica, ka “lielajam astotniekam” tiešām ir pretenzijas pret demokrātijas attīstības līmeni viņa vadītajā valstī. Taču viņš aicināja “neaizmirst, ka citas “astotnieka” valstis nav pārdzīvojušas tik dramatiskas pārmaiņas kā Krievijas Federācija. Viņi nav pārdzīvojuši pilsoņu karu, kāds faktiski risinājās Kaukāzā.”
Turklāt prezidents paziņoja, ka “daudzas tā dēvētās kopējās vērtības pie mums tiek aizsargātas labāk nekā dažās citās “astotnieka” valstīs. Pēc viņa teiktā, Krievijā joprojām ir spēkā nāvessoda moratorijs, bet dažas “lielā astotnieka” valstīs turpina izpildīt šo sodu.

Putins tikās ar “lielā astotnieka” valstu žurnālistiem 1.jūnijā pirms G8 galotņu apspriedes, kas trešdien sāksies Vācijā.

If you need it in English to show your friends, you can find it here:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/04/ap/world/main2883535.shtml

Stephen

A view from the East.......

A critical moment in history
Front page / Opinion / Columnists
05.06.2007 Source: 
The Western reaction to the words of Vladimir Putin is, as predictable, immature, ignorant, jingoistic and biased, since it does nothing to analyse the causes of Russia’s reaction to what can only constitute a provocation. This is a criical moment in the history of Europe and the world, and one which requires more diplomacy, dialogue and debate than drum-beating and harking back to Cold War rhetoric.

To every action, there is a reaction. This is a basic law of physics and one which is so patently obvious, it goes without saying. Not so, however, for a huge number of western Press outlets which seized upon the words of President Vladimir Putin regarding pointing missiles at Europe in response to the USA’s belligerent, aggressive and antagonistic attitude towards international relations, painting Russia as a threat and saying nothing about the causes and origins of Moscow’s stance.

Nothing was said of the USA’s recent history in international relations, namely the illegal act of butchery in Iraq based upon lies. War crimes have been committed, hundreds of thousands of civilians have been murdered, Nazi-style torture chambers and concentration camps have been set up, yet how many media outlets in Europe raise an eyebrow? Few, because many western European countries also have blood on their hands by giving Washington the nod.

Nothing has been said of Washington’s unilateral decision to pull out of the ABM treaty in 2002 and to instal nuclear missile defence systems on Russia’s borders, nothing has been said of NATO moving its frontiers to Russia’s own, installing antagonistic military attack systems on software in its new member states and performing the massive upgrading of weapons systems within striking distance of the very heart of Russia.

So what is Russia supposed to do? Stand by with its arms folded and say nothing? Or react and re-establish a proper and harmonious balance of power?

Needless to say, Russia’s military capacity to defend itself is second to none, and always has been. Hitler and Napoleon learnt the lesson the hard way. Today, Russia has every capacity to neutralise and liquidate any NATO build-up anywhere on the planet and everybody knows that and needless to say, Russia’s military equipment from Soviet times is intact – it has not simply disappeared and indeed, it has been upgraded.

Yet this is not the point. The point is, that the United States of America, the only power to have used nuclear weapons (and against civilians), is in the process of performing a military build-up on Russia’s frontiers and given the past history of US imperialism, given the fact that Washington is today the Queen of Liars, who can tell Russia that this does not constitute a potential threat?

Therefore those who criticise Russia for reacting would do well to start criticising those who caused the reaction – the United States of America. What are its military forces doing in Europe anyway, if not defending the arms lobby which dominates Washingon’s foreign policy? When will the Europeans stop crawling around Washington’s feet?

Timothy BANCROFT-HINCHEY

PRAVDA.Ru