Sveiks Peteri
Given that I was in college during the Nixon era, it’s hard for me to imagine that I would ever announce that the US ‘never lies’. However, I didn’t think that Colin Powell would knowingly lie, and there I was wrong.
In 2003 I wrote an article for DIENA where I stated I was against war as method for resolving problems and hoped that the US, UN and NATO would find a way to oust Hussein without going to war. However, if our allies found themselves in a war, we had to weigh all the arguments and decide whether we were going to help our allies or not. Yes, Latvia was among the coalition countries that later discovered that these arguments were not as sound as we first believed. If you look closely at Latvian government documents at the time, nowhere does Latvia endorse war. But we expressed a readiness to help our allies (9 NATO members) if they go to war. As I recall my only TV comments on this subject were on the Domburs show, where I defended the position taken by the Latvian president, Foreign Ministry and Saeima. At no time did I advocate war or invasion. I advocated support for our allies (who were supporting our membership in NATO). Even our allies were split. The US and UK took one position, France and Germany took another. Given the historical track record of these four countries vis a vis Latvia, the US and UK seemed like a better bet. We were not wrong in supporting our friends and allies. We were wrong in believing they had the best solution to the problem.
Have you seen the film ‘Charlie Wilson’s War’? It’s a fascinating study of the complex moral dilemmas that superpowers like the US face. The US armed the Afghans to help them defeat the Soviets, which was one of the factors which led to the breakup of the USSR and Latvia’s independence. No doubt many Latvians died on the Soviet side thanks to the US-Arab-Israeli-Turkish arms supply to the Afghans. Was Charlie Wilson’s war justified? Here again (as the end of the film points out) the US is good at waging war, but not very good at resolving problems. Today, NATO is fighting many of the same people that the US provided arms to in the 1980’s. Life is full of paradoxes and contradictions, and we are forced to take decisions between the lesser of many evils. Both you and I believe in promoting the long-term interests of Latvia. We just differ on how that is best achieved. That’s politics and that will never end. My defense of the Latvian government in 2003 was neither ferocious nor vehement, but it was firm. I still stand by that, even though the solution we hoped for did not materialize.
